Miami A Miami jury found Elon Musk’s Tesla automaker partially to blame for a fatal collision in Florida utilizing its Autopilot driver assistance system and ordered the business to compensate the victims with over $240 million.
The federal jury concluded that Tesla was largely to blame for the failure of its technology and that a careless driver—even one who acknowledged using his phone while driving—could not be held entirely accountable for the collision of a young couple who were out stargazing. Musk plans to launch a driverless taxi service in many cities in the upcoming months, and the decision comes as he tries to persuade Americans that his vehicles are safe enough to drive themselves.
The ruling concludes a four-year lawsuit that was noteworthy for both its conclusion and the fact that it proceeded to trial. In order to avoid the publicity of a trial, Tesla has settled several claims that were identical to itss and had them dismissed.
“This will open the floodgates,” attorney Miguel Custodio, who is not associated in the Tesla lawsuit, stated. “It will embolden a lot of people to come to court.”
Lawyers for the family of the dead, 22-year-old Naibel Benavides Leon, and her injured lover, Dillon Angulo, have made shocking accusations in this case. They asserted that Tesla either misplaced or concealed important information, such as data and video taken just prior to the collision. After being provided the facts, Tesla said that it had erred and that it honestly had not believed it to be there.
Neima Benavides, Benavides’ sister, stated, “We finally learned what happened that night, that the car was actually defective.” “Justice was achieved.”
Family members of other victims in Tesla crashes have previously accused the automaker of being hesitant to provide important information, a claim the company has refuted. By employing a forensic data specialist who unearthed the evidence, the plaintiffs in this case demonstrated that Tesla possessed it all along, despite its repeated denials.
“Today’s verdict is wrong,” Tesla stated in a statement, “and only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardize Tesla’s and the entire industry’s efforts to develop and implement lifesaving technology,” According to them, the plaintiffs made up a story about “blaming the car when the driver, from day one, admitted and accepted responsibility.”
The jury found that Tesla must pay $43 million of $129 million in compensatory damages for the crash, in addition to a $200 million punitive award. This means that the corporation will have to pay $243 million in total.
The financial expert Dan Ives of Wedbush Securities stated, “It’s a big number that will send shock waves to others in the industry.” “It’s not a good day for Tesla.”
According to Tesla, it will be appealed.
Even if that doesn’t work, the corporation claims that because of a pre-trial agreement that caps punitive damages at three times Tesla’s compensatory damages, it will ultimately pay much less than the jury found. In other words, $172 million instead of $243 million. However, according to the plaintiff, their agreement was predicated on a multiple of all compensatory losses, not just Tesla’s, and the business will be required to pay the amount the jury determined.
It’s unclear how much of a blow the Miami case’s verdict will do to Tesla’s safety reputation. Since the 2019 collision on a pitch-black country road in Key Largo, Florida, Tesla has significantly advanced its technology.
However, the question of whether or not people trust the firm in general was raised multiple times during the case, notably during Thursday’s final arguments. Brett Schreiber, the lead attorney for the plaintiffs, claimed that Tesla’s use of the term “Autopilot” demonstrated its willingness to deceive people and endanger their lives because the system only assists drivers with lane changes, slowing down a vehicle, and other tasks—far less than actually operating the vehicle.
According to Schreiber, other automakers include phrases like “copilot” and “driver assist” to ensure that drivers don’t rely too heavily on the technology.
“Words matter,” stated Schreiber. “And if someone is playing fast and lose with words, they’re playing fast and lose with information and facts.”
Schreiber admitted that George McGee, the driver, was careless when he crashed into a Chevrolet Tahoe that the couple had parked to see the stars after speeding past a stop sign, flashing lights, and a T-intersection at 62 miles per hour.
Benavides was launched 75 feet into the surrounding woods, where her body was eventually discovered, by the Tahoe’s intense spin. Angulo also suffered a traumatic brain injury and shattered bones as a result, arriving to the courtroom on Friday with a limp and a cushion to sit on.
However, Schreiber claimed that Tesla was still at fault. He added that by allowing drivers to use Autopilot on narrower roads that it was not intended for, such as the one McGee was traveling on, and by failing to turn off the system as soon as they started displaying signs of preoccupation, Tesla enabled drivers to behave irresponsibly.
“I trusted the technology too much,” McGee admitted during his testimony. “I believed that if the car saw something in front of it, it would provide a warning and apply the brakes.”
Joel Smith, the primary defense attorney in the Miami case, retorted that although Tesla advises drivers to keep their hands on the wheel and eyes on the road, McGee decided to speed while searching for a dropped cellphone, increasing the risk. Smith stated that the cause could only be attributed to one thing, pointing out that McGee had passed the crossing thirty or forty times before and had never been involved in an accident. “The cause is that he dropped his cellphone.”
Because a finding of Tesla culpability despite a driver’s acknowledgment of dangerous activity would pose serious legal concerns for every firm as they create cars that increasingly drive themselves, the auto industry has been keenly monitoring the case.
Copyright 2025 NPR
